Every leader has been here, or will be.
The first calls did not land the way you hoped. The campaign you bet on did not return. The partnership you invested in went sideways. The fundraiser came up short. The hire who was supposed to change everything did not change anything. Capital is lower than it should be. Energy is lower than it should be. Confidence is lower than anyone is letting on.
And now you can feel the pressure building. The pressure to make it up. To perform at a level you have never performed at before. To squeeze more out of what little remains. To prove, to yourself and everyone watching, that the picture is not actually as bad as it looks.
This is the moment that decides what kind of leader you actually are. Not the moment of original strategy. Not the moment of public success. This one. The moment where the pressure says “do something bigger” and discipline says “do something smaller and slower.”
The leaders who chase their bets in this moment lose more than the bets they have already lost. The leaders who do not are the ones organizations remember.
What Chasing Your Bets Actually Looks Like
The phrase comes from gambling, and the parallel is exact. A player loses two hands and walks to the ATM. Loses again and walks to the ATM. Each trip is rationalized. “I can feel it turning.” “One good hand and I am back to even.” “I just need one more chance.” Nobody at the table calls it desperation. They call it “playing through.” Everyone watching knows what it actually is.
It plays out in organizations the same way.
A leader doubles down on the failing campaign because so much has already been spent that pulling out feels like admitting the original bet was wrong.
An executive director hires someone they cannot afford because the organization needs to look like it has momentum, and an empty seat is too quiet to bear.
A founder over-promises to donors to cover a shortfall, locking themselves into commitments that will create the next shortfall on a larger scale.
An organization pivots strategy three times in a year, each pivot more aggressive than the last, each one rationalized as "now we have learned what does not work."
And the one I have come back to over and over, because it is so quiet and so revealing:
Chasing your bets almost never feels like chasing your bets in the moment. It feels like decisiveness. It feels like leadership. It feels like the responsible thing to do given the circumstances. And in some narrow sense, all of that is even true.
But the thing your organization actually needs in those moments is not more action. It is better action. And those are not the same thing.
Why This Impulse Is So Strong
I want to be honest about something before I keep going. Every leader has this in them. Every one. I have it in me. You have it in you. The leaders I have most admired have it in them, and they would tell you so. It is not a moral failing. It is the natural, felt state of being a leader under pressure with limited resources and limited time.
The whole point of leadership discipline is not pretending the impulse is not there. The whole point is choosing against it when it matters most.
This is what makes the chasing-your-bets pattern so dangerous. It does not feel like a corruption of leadership. It feels like a natural extension of it. The fear is real. The pressure is real. The pull to do something, anything, to relieve both is real. And the deeper you are in the hole, the more compelling the impulse becomes.
Chasing your bets does not feel like a corruption of leadership. It feels like a natural extension of it. That is exactly what makes it so dangerous.
The leaders who hold the line in those moments are not leaders without fear. They are leaders who have learned, often the hard way, that acting from fear is a faster way to lose than holding still and thinking clearly. That fear-driven decisions made with shrinking resources tend to consume the remaining resources at a rate that is not justified by the outcomes they produce.
The gambler at the ATM is not stupid. He is just being run by something other than judgement. And he is running out of the very thing he is using to try to recover.
The Quicksand Principle
I have never seen a leader or an organization thrash their way out of a hole. Not once. In every situation I have watched, the more frantic the response to a downturn, the deeper the downturn became.
It is like quicksand. The instinct in quicksand is to fight harder, move faster, try with more force to pull yourself out. And every one of those instincts makes the situation worse. The wisdom in quicksand is the opposite of the instinct. Slow down. Distribute your weight. Move deliberately. Wait.
Leadership in a tight spot works the same way.
When your available moves are limited, the answer is not to move faster and more recklessly out of panic. The answer is the opposite. You have to treat each remaining move with that much more respect. Give it the time it deserves. Run the analysis you would not have bothered with when you had ten chances to spare. Plan the move that, if it does not work, leaves you with at least one move after it.
The leaders who do this look, to outside observers, like they are doing less than the situation demands. They are slow to act. They table decisions for more thinking. They ask uncomfortable questions about why the original strategy did not work before they sign off on the next one. They frustrate the people around them who want action and want it now.
And then, more often than not, they get out of the hole. Quietly. Without theatrics. By doing the small number of right things instead of the large number of urgent things.
How Great Leaders Actually Make Decisions Under Pressure
The best leaders I have witnessed approach hard decisions like a ship's captain reads the sea before setting course.
They look out at the water. They smell the air. They watch the clouds. They notice the colour of the sky. They check the direction of the wind. They feel the rhythm of the waves. They are not stalling. They are gathering information that anyone in a hurry would have missed. They are letting the situation tell them what it actually is, instead of imposing on it what they hope it might be.
And then, after the information has been gathered and the strategy has been built and the team has been heard, they make the call. With confidence. Decisively. And they live with it.
This is the difference between “this could work” and “this should work.” Both are leadership statements. They sound similar. They are not the same thing.
“This could work”
A quick read of the surface. What you say when the pressure is on, options are narrow, and the cost of stillness feels higher than the cost of action. Hope dressed up as plan.
“This should work”
What comes out of the long pause. From the geographical charts and historical reports of the situation. Hope grounded in evidence, tested against alternatives, and weighed against the cost of failure.
The honest question every leader should ask themselves before a major call is this: which one would you follow on a long journey?
If you would not follow your own current plan, do not make your organization follow it either.
The Discipline of the Pause
The best leaders I have ever witnessed share a few quiet habits that almost nobody talks about. They are the habits that make the difference between chasing bets and captaining the ship.
They are often the last to speak.
Not because they have nothing to say, but because they want to hear everything first. They want the room's actual thinking, not the version of the thinking that gets shaped by the leader's opening position. The pause before they speak is doing work the rest of the room never sees.
They table discussions on purpose.
They are willing to slow down a meeting, frustrate a board, and delay a decision in order to make sure the call they make is the right one. They have made peace with the discomfort of leaving something unresolved overnight, because they know that one unresolved night is cheaper than one wrong decision made a day too soon.
They measure many times before they cut.
The old carpenter's rule is "measure twice, cut once." The best leaders measure seventeen times when the cut is expensive and irreversible. They are not afraid of looking indecisive. They are afraid of cutting wrong. And they know that a leader who cuts wrong with confidence is more dangerous than a leader who measures slowly with humility.
They are okay frustrating people in the process.
They know that arriving at "this should work" instead of "this could work" requires creating discomfort in the people around them who want fast answers. They do not seek the discomfort, but they refuse to trade clarity for the comfort of the group. The frustration is a tax they are willing to pay to land in the right place.
What Boards Can Do
If you are on a board and your organization is in a tight spot, your job is to be the counterweight to the chasing impulse. Not the cheerleader who applauds the next bold move. Not the chorus of voices urging the executive to “do something.” The body in the room that is willing to slow things down when the pressure to speed up is the loudest.
Ask the question nobody else is asking.
"What does this decision look like if it does not work? What do we have left if it fails?" If the answer is "we are out of moves," then the decision is too consequential to make without more time and more analysis.
Watch for emotional decision-making in the room.
The hire that fills the discomfort of an empty seat. The campaign that is justified because so much has already been spent on it. The strategic pivot that follows three previous pivots. When the energy in the room is more emotional than analytical, slow the room down before it makes the next call.
Protect your executive from the pressure.
If your ED is starting to make decisions that feel like chasing bets, the answer is not to demand bigger wins. It is to give them the space to think, to plan, to take the long view. Boards that pressure their executives to outperform in moments of weakness usually get a worse version of the executive they hired.
The Real Test
The next time you feel the pull to do something bigger, faster, or bolder to make up for ground you have already lost, ask yourself this.
Am I making this call because the evidence supports it? Or am I making this call because I cannot bear to keep feeling what I am feeling right now? One of those is leadership. The other is the gambler at the ATM.
This is the test that separates great leaders from desperate ones. It is not whether the impulse to chase is there. The impulse is always there, in every leader, in every season of pressure. The test is whether you can recognize it in yourself and choose against it when it shows up.
If you are honest, you know which call you would follow on a long journey. The one that is built on a quick read of the surface, or the one that is built on the long, careful study of the territory. The one that came from panic, or the one that came from the pause.
The leaders worth following are the ones who refuse to confuse motion with progress. Who treat their remaining moves with the respect they deserve. Who would rather frustrate a few people in the room than ship a half-built decision into a high-stakes situation.
Slow down when the pressure is at its highest. Get the information you actually need. Build the plan from “this should work” rather than from “this could work.” Make peace with the fact that doing less, sometimes, is the most courageous thing a leader can do.
The hole you are in did not appear in a moment. You will not get out of it in one either. And the way out is almost never the next big bet. It is the next small, calm, calculated, well-considered move.
Captain the ship. Read the sky. Feel the wind. Make the call you can stand behind.
That is the leadership the moment is actually asking of you.
Is your organization in a tight spot right now?
If you are feeling the pressure to make a bigger move, a faster move, or a riskier move than the situation justifies, that is often the moment to pause and bring in a thinking partner. No pressure, no pitch. Just a conversation.
Book a Discovery CallKeep Reading
The Ship of Theseus Problem: Why Vision-Led Organizations Quietly Lose Themselves
When vision outranks values in governance, values don't get deleted. They get redefined.
Read articleBoard GovernanceGovern Instead of Guess: Why Every Board Needs a Real Policy Manual
Most nonprofit boards operate without a real board policy manual. The result is quiet erosion of trust, ED burnout, and mission drift.
Read articleBoard GovernanceThe Most Valuable Person on Your Board Might Be the One Who Frustrates You
Dissenting voices on a board are not obstacles to good governance. They are the safeguard against unchecked groupthink.
Read article